ATPHard (Indoor)Vienna2026-10-27 10:00
Tallon Griekspoor v Brandon Nakashima
The market
No published price yet
Percentages are the implied chance of winning with the bookmaker's margin removed.
Head to head
T. Griekspoor1
B. Nakashima1
| Date | Event | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-22 | Vienna | T. GriekspoorvB. Nakashima | 7-6 7-6 |
| 2022-05-25 | French Open | B. NakashimavT. Griekspoor | 7-6 6-4 6-2 |
This season & this event
T. Griekspoor
B. Nakashima
21-24
17-15
Lost QF to A. Zverev
Did not play
2026 record
2026 on hard
Here in 2025
Here in 2024
39-22
33-17
Lost R16 to T. Griekspoor
Lost R16 to K. Khachanov
Ranking points fall off a year after they are earned, so a player who went deep here last year must match it or drop in the rankings. That shapes effort in a way the price does not always show.
The players

Tallon Griekspoor
Netherlands

Brandon Nakashima
USA
58
30
Netherlands
15–22
0
10–12
3–7
1–3
Ranking
Age
Country
2026 W/L
Titles
Hard
Clay
Grass
18
25
USA
33–19
0
24–12
5–5
4–2
Ranking, record and surface splits are for the most recent season on file. Height, weight and handedness are not published by our data provider.
T. Griekspoor — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-25 | Brussels | Hard (Indoor) | J-L. Struff | 1.77 | 55% | WON | |
Games in each set4-6 6-3 6-4 GriekspoorStruffPoints won54%46%Serve points won71%64%Return points won36%29%Games held14 of 1512 of 14Break points saved6 of 73 of 5Aces1917Double faults32 | |||||||
| 2026-10-24 | Brussels | Hard (Indoor) | F. Cerundolo | 2.34 | 58% | WON | |
Games in each set2-6 6-3 7-6 GriekspoorCerundoloPoints won50%50%Serve points won67%70%Return points won30%33%Games held12 of 1512 of 14Break points saved2 of 52 of 4Aces93Double faults24 | |||||||
| 2026-10-23 | Brussels | Hard (Indoor) | J. Lehecka | 3.34 | 71% | WON | |
Games in each set4-6 6-4 6-3 GriekspoorLeheckaPoints won52%48%Serve points won63%62%Return points won38%37%Games held13 of 1511 of 14Break points saved5 of 71 of 4Aces711Double faults40 | |||||||
| 2026-10-21 | Brussels | Hard (Indoor) | M. Navone | 1.62 | 60% | WON | |
Games in each set7-6 7-5 GriekspoorNavonePoints won51%49%Serve points won68%66%Return points won34%32%Games held10 of 129 of 12Break points saved4 of 60 of 3Aces146Double faults22 | |||||||
| 2026-10-19 | Brussels | Hard (Indoor) | M. Schoenhaus | 1.27 | 76% | WON | |
Games in each set7-6 6-7 7-5 GriekspoorSchoenhausPoints won53%47%Serve points won79%71%Return points won29%21%Games held18 of 1817 of 18Break points saved3 of 32 of 3Aces3412Double faults43 | |||||||
| 2026-10-08 | Shanghai | Hard | P. Kotov | 1.47 | 66% | LOST | |
Games in each set4-6 6-7 GriekspoorKotovPoints won46%54%Serve points won64%75%Return points won25%36%Games held9 of 1110 of 11Break points saved4 of 60 of 1Aces76Double faults30 | |||||||
| 2026-09-30 | Beijing | Hard | A. Rublev | 2.54 | 62% | LOST | |
Games in each set4-6 7-5 6-7 GriekspoorRublevPoints won50%50%Serve points won72%71%Return points won29%28%Games held16 of 1716 of 17Break points saved5 of 64 of 5Aces1919Double faults42 | |||||||
| 2026-09-23 | Chengdu | Hard | D. Shapovalov | 2.18 | 55% | LOST | |
Games in each set4-6 6-7 GriekspoorShapovalovPoints won51%49%Serve points won75%68%Return points won32%25%Games held9 of 1110 of 11Break points saved1 of 33 of 4Aces611Double faults14 | |||||||
| 2026-09-18 | ATP Davis Cup - World Group I | - Preliminary | N. Mejia | 1.17 | 80% | WON | |
Games in each set6-2 6-4 GriekspoorMejiaPoints won61%39%Serve points won76%55%Return points won45%24%Games held9 of 96 of 9Break points saved3 of 31 of 4Aces132Double faults22 | |||||||
| 2026-09-01 | US Open | Hard | B. Shelton | 6.58 | 85% | LOST | |
Games in each set6-1 1-6 6-7 2-6 GriekspoorSheltonPoints won45%55%Serve points won60%69%Return points won31%40%Games held12 of 1714 of 17Break points saved2 of 75 of 8Aces812Double faults76 | |||||||
B. Nakashima — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-23 | Lyon (France) - Qualification | Hard (Indoor) | F. Cobolli | 1.61 | 60% | LOST | |
Games in each set6-4 4-6 4-6 NakashimaCobolliPoints won47%53%Serve points won59%69%Return points won31%41%Games held12 of 1513 of 15Break points saved7 of 103 of 5Aces133Double faults12 | |||||||
| 2026-10-22 | Lyon (France) - Qualification | Hard (Indoor) | K. Jacquet | 1.56 | 62% | WON | |
Games in each set6-4 6-3 NakashimaJacquetPoints won56%44%Serve points won72%55%Return points won45%28%Games held9 of 106 of 9Break points saved2 of 34 of 7Aces138Double faults04 | |||||||
| 2026-10-19 | Lyon (France) - Qualification | Hard (Indoor) | H. Medjedovic | 1.36 | 71% | WON | |
Games in each set7-6 6-7 6-2 NakashimaMedjedovicPoints won53%47%Serve points won79%74%Return points won26%21%Games held16 of 1614 of 16Break points saved2 of 23 of 5Aces2714Double faults03 | |||||||
| 2026-10-12 | Shanghai | Hard | A. Bublik | 1.87 | 52% | LOST | |
Games in each set7-6 3-6 6-7 NakashimaBublikPoints won45%55%Serve points won70%81%Return points won19%30%Games held15 of 1617 of 17Break points saved0 of 10 of 0Aces1222Double faults22 | |||||||
| 2026-10-10 | Shanghai | Hard | M. Berrettini | 1.64 | 59% | WON | |
Games in each set7-6 7-5 NakashimaBerrettiniPoints won51%49%Serve points won75%75%Return points won25%25%Games held12 of 1211 of 12Break points saved3 of 33 of 4Aces512Double faults14 | |||||||
| 2026-09-30 | Tokyo | Hard | U. Humbert | 1.48 | 66% | LOST | |
Games in each set3-6 2-6 NakashimaHumbertPoints won36%64%Serve points won52%88%Return points won12%48%Games held5 of 89 of 9Break points saved9 of 120 of 0Aces16Double faults21 | |||||||
| 2026-09-25 | ATP Laver Cup | Hard (Indoor) | J. Mensik | 2.27 | 57% | WON | |
Games in each set6-1 3-6 10-7 NakashimaMensikPoints won53%47%Serve points won72%67%Return points won33%28%Games held7 of 86 of 8Break points saved1 of 21 of 3Aces32Double faults11 | |||||||
| 2026-09-02 | US Open | Hard | A. Michelsen | 1.45 | 67% | LOST | |
Games in each set3-6 4-6 4-6 NakashimaMichelsenPoints won44%56%Serve points won63%75%Return points won25%37%Games held10 of 1414 of 15Break points saved3 of 72 of 3Aces104Double faults44 | |||||||
| 2026-08-31 | US Open | Hard | S. Baez | 1.14 | 85% | WON | |
Games in each set6-2 6-1 6-0 NakashimaBaezPoints won67%33%Serve points won75%42%Return points won58%25%Games held11 of 113 of 10Break points saved3 of 34 of 11Aces120Double faults04 | |||||||
| 2026-08-23 | Cincinnati | Hard | F. Tiafoe | 1.88 | 52% | LOST | |
Games in each set5-7 3-6 NakashimaTiafoePoints won46%54%Serve points won54%61%Return points won39%46%Games held6 of 118 of 10Break points saved5 of 107 of 9Aces97Double faults25 | |||||||
Common questions
What is the head-to-head between Tallon Griekspoor and Brandon Nakashima?
They have met 2 times and they are level at 1-1.