Jordan Chiu v Kristjan Tamm
Head to head
| Date | Event | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-04 | M15 Maanshan 9 | J. ChiuvK. Tamm | 3-6 2-6 |
This season & this event
Ranking points fall off a year after they are earned, so a player who went deep here last year must match it or drop in the rankings. That shapes effort in a way the price does not always show.
No previous edition of this event found in the feed.
The players


Ranking, record and surface splits are for the most recent season on file. Height, weight and handedness are not published by our data provider.
J. Chiu — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-04 | M15 Maanshan 9 | Hard | K. Tamm | 3.31 | 71% | LOST | |
Games in each set3-6 2-6 ChiuTammPoints won40%60%Serve points won54%78%Return points won22%46%Games held5 of 89 of 9Break points saved7 of 100 of 0 | |||||||
| 2026-10-21 | M15 Shenzhen (China) | Hard | F. Peliwo | 3.90 | 76% | LOST | |
Games in each set2-6 3-6 ChiuPeliwoPoints won41%59%Serve points won55%73%Return points won27%45%Games held5 of 89 of 9Break points saved0 of 30 of 0 | |||||||
| 2026-10-14 | M25 Qian Daohu | Hard | C. Hewitt | 8.71 | 89% | LOST | |
Games in each set1-6 2-6 ChiuHewittPoints won41%59%Serve points won53%70%Return points won30%47%Games held3 of 78 of 8Break points saved3 of 74 of 4 | |||||||
| 2026-10-08 | M25 Luan | Hard | M. Dellavedova | 8.20 | 89% | LOST | |
Games in each set0-6 1-6 ChiuDellavedovaPoints won36%64%Serve points won37%65%Return points won35%63%Games held1 of 67 of 7Break points saved2 of 73 of 3 | |||||||
| 2026-10-07 | M25 Luan | Hard | X. Zhou | 1.56 | 61% | WON | |
Games in each set7-5 6-1 ChiuZhouPoints won56%44%Serve points won60%49%Return points won51%40%Games held8 of 95 of 10Break points saved8 of 911 of 16 | |||||||
| 2026-09-30 | M15 Luan 4 | Hard | K. Wang | 1.83 | 50% | LOST | |
Games in each set1-6 1-6 ChiuWangPoints won34%66%Serve points won37%68%Return points won32%63%Games held1 of 76 of 7Break points saved5 of 112 of 3 | |||||||
| 2026-04-29 | M15 Villahermosa | Hard | D. Van Orderlain | 1.94 | 51% | LOST | |
Games in each set6-4 2-6 6-7 | |||||||
| 2026-04-28 | M15 Villahermosa | Hard | S. Goity Zapico | 1.91 | 50% | WON | |
Games in each set7-5 3-6 6-3 | |||||||
| 2026-04-22 | M25 Xalapa | Hard | A. Hernandez | 5.33 | 82% | LOST | |
Games in each set3-6 1-6 | |||||||
K. Tamm — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-04 | M15 Maanshan 9 | Hard | J. Chiu | 1.34 | 71% | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 6-2 TammChiuPoints won60%40%Serve points won78%54%Return points won46%22%Games held9 of 95 of 8Break points saved0 of 07 of 10 | |||||||
| 2026-10-29 | M15 Singapore 4 (Singapore) | — | M. Rifqi Fitriadi | — | — | LOST | |
Games in each set2-6 6-4 4-6 TammFitriadiPoints won47%53%Serve points won65%70%Return points won30%35%Games held10 of 1412 of 14Break points saved3 of 62 of 4 | |||||||
| 2026-10-27 | M15 Singapore 4 (Singapore), Hard | — | J. D. Tan | — | — | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 7-6 | |||||||
| 2026-10-21 | M15 Shenzhen (China) | Hard | T. Derepasko | 1.95 | 51% | LOST | |
Games in each set5-7 6-7 TammDerepaskoPoints won47%53%Serve points won62%69%Return points won31%38%Games held9 of 1210 of 12Break points saved3 of 51 of 2 | |||||||
| 2026-10-16 | M25 Qian Daohu | Hard | M. Borisiouk | 3.24 | 71% | LOST | |
Games in each set6-3 4-6 3-6 TammBorisioukPoints won49%51%Serve points won60%62%Return points won38%40%Games held10 of 1411 of 14Break points saved6 of 104 of 7 | |||||||
| 2026-10-15 | M25 Qian Daohu | Hard | A. Shepp | 3.86 | 76% | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 3-6 6-3 TammSheppPoints won55%45%Serve points won57%48%Return points won52%43%Games held9 of 137 of 14Break points saved9 of 126 of 11 | |||||||
| 2026-10-14 | M25 Qian Daohu | Hard | X. D. Chen | — | — | WON | |
Games in each set6-1 6-4 TammChenPoints won61%39%Serve points won80%54%Return points won46%20%Games held9 of 95 of 9Break points saved0 of 04 of 7 | |||||||
| 2026-10-05 | Wuning 3 (China) - Qualification | Hard | M. Borisiouk | 3.51 | 73% | LOST | |
Games in each set4-6 4-6 TammBorisioukPoints won42%58%Serve points won64%85%Return points won15%36%Games held8 of 1010 of 10Break points saved1 of 30 of 0Aces410Double faults10 | |||||||
| 2026-10-04 | Wuning 3 (China) - Qualification | Hard | N. Honda | 3.00 | 69% | WON | |
Games in each set7-6 6-4 TammHondaPoints won56%44%Serve points won78%60%Return points won40%22%Games held10 of 119 of 11Break points saved0 of 17 of 9Aces91Double faults13 | |||||||
| 2026-09-18 | ATP Davis Cup - World Group II | - Preliminary | F. Roncadelli | 3.75 | 75% | LOST | |
Games in each set4-6 2-6 TammRoncadelliPoints won42%58%Serve points won45%61%Return points won39%55%Games held4 of 97 of 9Break points saved2 of 75 of 7 | |||||||
Common questions
Who is favourite, Jordan Chiu or Kristjan Tamm?
Kristjan Tamm is favourite at 1.34, which is a 71% chance once the bookmaker's margin is removed.
What are the odds for Jordan Chiu vs Kristjan Tamm?
Jordan Chiu is 3.31 and Kristjan Tamm is 1.34, the prices we recorded for the M15 Maanshan 9 match.
What is the head-to-head between Jordan Chiu and Kristjan Tamm?
They have met 1 time and Kristjan Tamm leads 1-0.