Daniel Milavsky v Max Hans Rehberg
Match preview, prediction and odds
Our pick
LeanM. H. Rehberg is 7-3 over the last ten and 19-9 on hard this season. D. Milavsky is 6-4 over the last ten and 37-23 on hard this season.
The pick is M. H. Rehberg to win. We make it a 55% chance, so it is only worth backing at 1.83 or bigger. At 1.67 that is not there yet - leave it, or wait for the price to drift in-play (an early break against usually does it).
An opinion from the numbers, not a guarantee. 19+, bet responsibly.
Key numbers
| D. Milavsky | M. H. Rehberg | |
|---|---|---|
| 315 | Ranking | 280 |
| 6-4 | Last 10 | 7-3 |
| WWWLW | Last 5 | WLWWL |
| +0.6 | V the odds | +0.8 |
| 44-26 | Season | 50-25 |
| 37-23 | Hard 2026 | 19-9 |
| 3 | Last 7 days | 2 |
| 2d | Days rest | 3d |
| 3 | Wins here | 1 |
| Clear | Fitness | Clear |
| Head to head First meeting |
V the odds: wins above (or below) what the prices expected over the last 10 - form with the strength of the opposition built in.
The market
Percentages are the implied chance of winning with the bookmaker's margin removed.
Head to head
This season & this event
Ranking points fall off a year after they are earned, so a player who went deep here last year must match it or drop in the rankings. That shapes effort in a way the price does not always show.
The players


Ranking, record and surface splits are for the most recent season on file. Height, weight and handedness are not published by our data provider.
D. Milavsky — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-03 | Charlottesville | Hard | A. Galarneau | 1.88 | 51% | WON | |
Games in each set7-6 6-3 MilavskyGalarneauPoints won56%44%Serve points won74%61%Return points won39%26%Games held10 of 118 of 10Break points saved2 of 37 of 9Aces105Double faults35 | |||||||
| 2026-11-02 | Charlottesville | Hard | S. Mitsui | 1.48 | 64% | WON | |
Games in each set7-6 7-6 MilavskyMitsuiPoints won52%48%Serve points won58%52%Return points won48%42%Games held8 of 128 of 12Break points saved6 of 109 of 13Aces42Double faults23 | |||||||
| 2026-11-01 | Charlottesville | Hard | J. Charlton | 1.06 | 89% | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 7-6 MilavskyCharltonPoints won52%48%Serve points won60%58%Return points won42%40%Games held8 of 107 of 11Break points saved9 of 112 of 6Aces75Double faults42 | |||||||
| 2026-10-28 | Sioux Falls | Hard (Indoor) | J.J. Wolf | 2.94 | 67% | LOST | |
Games in each set6-7 6-7 MilavskyWolfPoints won48%52%Serve points won59%64%Return points won36%41%Games held10 of 1210 of 12Break points saved5 of 71 of 3Aces106Double faults13 | |||||||
| 2026-10-26 | Sioux Falls | Hard (Indoor) | H. Wendelken | 1.94 | 50% | WON | |
Games in each set6-4 4-6 6-3 MilavskyWendelkenPoints won54%46%Serve points won68%62%Return points won38%32%Games held14 of 1512 of 14Break points saved8 of 910 of 12Aces134Double faults36 | |||||||
| 2026-10-21 | Fort Worth (Usa) | Hard | Dar. Blanch | 2.81 | 66% | LOST | |
Games in each set1-6 4-6 MilavskyBlanchPoints won43%57%Serve points won57%72%Return points won28%43%Games held5 of 89 of 9Break points saved3 of 62 of 2Aces56Double faults34 | |||||||
| 2026-10-19 | Fort Worth (Usa) | Hard | G. Nanda | 1.17 | 79% | WON | |
Games in each set6-4 6-4 MilavskyNandaPoints won57%43%Serve points won76%54%Return points won46%24%Games held9 of 107 of 10Break points saved0 of 112 of 15Aces32Double faults03 | |||||||
| 2026-09-30 | Columbus | Hard (Indoor) | Dar. Blanch | 2.66 | 65% | LOST | |
Games in each set3-6 6-1 3-6 MilavskyBlanchPoints won51%49%Serve points won62%57%Return points won43%38%Games held9 of 1210 of 13Break points saved4 of 711 of 14Aces614Double faults34 | |||||||
| 2026-09-28 | Columbus | Hard (Indoor) | B. Bicknell | 1.37 | 70% | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 6-2 MilavskyBicknellPoints won56%44%Serve points won69%59%Return points won41%31%Games held9 of 95 of 8Break points saved3 of 37 of 10Aces26Double faults74 | |||||||
| 2026-09-22 | San Diego 2 (Usa) - Qualification | Hard | T. Legout | 2.45 | 62% | LOST | |
Games in each set5-7 7-6 2-6 MilavskyLegoutPoints won49%51%Serve points won57%60%Return points won40%43%Games held10 of 1613 of 16Break points saved13 of 199 of 12Aces92Double faults55 | |||||||
M. H. Rehberg — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-02 | Charlottesville | Hard | T. Svajda | 1.61 | 60% | WON | |
Games in each set6-4 3-6 7-5 RehbergSvajdaPoints won50%50%Serve points won64%64%Return points won36%36%Games held12 of 1512 of 16Break points saved1 of 42 of 6Aces55Double faults51 | |||||||
| 2026-10-30 | Sioux Falls | Hard (Indoor) | S. Dominko | 1.68 | 58% | LOST | |
Games in each set6-7 4-6 RehbergDominkoPoints won48%52%Serve points won61%70%Return points won30%39%Games held9 of 1110 of 11Break points saved7 of 93 of 4Aces010Double faults23 | |||||||
| 2026-10-28 | Sioux Falls | Hard (Indoor) | S. Kozlov | 1.57 | 62% | WON | |
Games in each set7-5 6-4 RehbergKozlovPoints won54%46%Serve points won62%59%Return points won41%38%Games held10 of 118 of 11Break points saved10 of 115 of 8Aces81Double faults32 | |||||||
| 2026-10-26 | Sioux Falls | Hard (Indoor) | B. Shick | 1.71 | 56% | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 6-3 RehbergShickPoints won56%44%Serve points won63%52%Return points won48%37%Games held8 of 95 of 9Break points saved4 of 52 of 6Aces72Double faults12 | |||||||
| 2026-10-19 | Fort Worth (Usa) | Hard | M. Rottgering | 2.16 | 56% | LOST | |
Games in each set2-6 1-6 RehbergRottgeringPoints won38%62%Serve points won47%76%Return points won24%53%Games held3 of 87 of 7Break points saved6 of 110 of 0Aces36Double faults22 | |||||||
| 2026-10-08 | Villena | Clay | H. Barton | 1.75 | 55% | LOST | |
Games in each set1-6 7-6 6-7 RehbergBartonPoints won46%54%Serve points won63%75%Return points won25%37%Games held13 of 1615 of 15Break points saved7 of 105 of 5Aces29Double faults65 | |||||||
| 2026-10-06 | Villena | Clay | E. Butvilas | 2.45 | 60% | WON | |
Games in each set1-6 6-4 7-5 RehbergButvilasPoints won49%51%Serve points won61%63%Return points won37%39%Games held10 of 1411 of 15Break points saved2 of 60 of 4Aces12Double faults30 | |||||||
| 2026-10-05 | Villena | Clay | M. Poljicak | 1.54 | 62% | WON | |
Games in each set5-7 6-3 6-3 RehbergPoljicakPoints won54%46%Serve points won72%62%Return points won38%28%Games held13 of 1511 of 15Break points saved3 of 52 of 6Aces812Double faults23 | |||||||
| 2026-10-04 | Villena | Clay | D. Cukierman | 1.07 | 89% | WON | |
Games in each set6-7 6-3 6-3 RehbergCukiermanPoints won52%48%Serve points won59%56%Return points won44%41%Games held12 of 159 of 15Break points saved1 of 44 of 10Aces107Double faults49 | |||||||
| 2026-09-19 | M25 Santa Margherita di Pula 7 | Clay | A. Chepelev | — | — | WON | |
Games in each set6-0 6-1 RehbergChepelevPoints won65%35%Serve points won65%36%Return points won64%35%Games held6 of 70 of 6Break points saved4 of 54 of 10 | |||||||
Common questions
Who is favourite, Daniel Milavsky or Max Hans Rehberg?
Max Hans Rehberg is favourite at 1.67, which is a 55% chance once the bookmaker's margin is removed.
What are the odds for Daniel Milavsky vs Max Hans Rehberg?
Daniel Milavsky is 2.05 and Max Hans Rehberg is 1.67, the prices we recorded for the Charlottesville match.
Who will win Daniel Milavsky vs Max Hans Rehberg?
Our model makes it Max Hans Rehberg to win at 1.67 (Lean confidence).