ChallengerHardFort Worth (Usa)2026-10-21 17:00
Daniel Milavsky v Darwin Blanch
The market
No published price yet
Percentages are the implied chance of winning with the bookmaker's margin removed.
Head to head
D. Milavsky0
Dar. Blanch1
| Date | Event | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-30 | Columbus | Dar. BlanchvD. Milavsky | 6-3 1-6 6-3 |
This season & this event
D. Milavsky
Dar. Blanch
40-24
33-21
Did not play
Did not play
2026 record
2026 on hard
Here in 2025
Here in 2024
30-27
17-18
Did not play
Did not play
Ranking points fall off a year after they are earned, so a player who went deep here last year must match it or drop in the rankings. That shapes effort in a way the price does not always show.
No previous edition of this event found in the feed.
The players

Daniel Milavsky
USA

Darwin Blanch
USA
316
25
USA
38–23
1
33–20
1–2
4–1
Ranking
Age
Country
2026 W/L
Titles
Hard
Clay
Grass
163
19
USA
28–26
1
13–15
10–7
5–4
Ranking, record and surface splits are for the most recent season on file. Height, weight and handedness are not published by our data provider.
D. Milavsky — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-19 | Fort Worth (Usa) | Hard | G. Nanda | 1.17 | 79% | WON | |
Games in each set6-4 6-4 MilavskyNandaPoints won57%43%Serve points won76%54%Return points won46%24%Games held9 of 107 of 10Break points saved0 of 112 of 15Aces32Double faults03 | |||||||
| 2026-09-30 | Columbus | Hard (Indoor) | Dar. Blanch | 2.66 | 65% | LOST | |
Games in each set3-6 6-1 3-6 MilavskyBlanchPoints won51%49%Serve points won62%57%Return points won43%38%Games held9 of 1210 of 13Break points saved4 of 711 of 14Aces614Double faults34 | |||||||
| 2026-09-28 | Columbus | Hard (Indoor) | B. Bicknell | 1.37 | 70% | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 6-2 MilavskyBicknellPoints won56%44%Serve points won69%59%Return points won41%31%Games held9 of 95 of 8Break points saved3 of 37 of 10Aces26Double faults74 | |||||||
| 2026-09-22 | San Diego 2 (Usa) - Qualification | Hard | T. Legout | 2.45 | 62% | LOST | |
Games in each set5-7 7-6 2-6 MilavskyLegoutPoints won49%51%Serve points won57%60%Return points won40%43%Games held10 of 1613 of 16Break points saved13 of 199 of 12Aces92Double faults55 | |||||||
| 2026-09-14 | Tiburon | Hard | F. A. Gomez | 1.67 | 56% | LOST | |
Games in each set6-4 6-7 2-6 MilavskyGomezPoints won48%52%Serve points won61%66%Return points won34%39%Games held12 of 1513 of 15Break points saved3 of 65 of 7Aces77Double faults68 | |||||||
| 2026-08-25 | US Open | Hard | S. Mochizuki | 2.25 | 57% | LOST | |
Games in each set6-7 4-6 MilavskyMochizukiPoints won49%51%Serve points won60%62%Return points won38%40%Games held8 of 119 of 11Break points saved7 of 103 of 5Aces75Double faults39 | |||||||
| 2026-08-15 | Brownsburg (Usa) - Qualification | Hard | L. Harris | 2.74 | 65% | LOST | |
Games in each set7-6 3-6 3-6 MilavskyHarrisPoints won45%55%Serve points won62%74%Return points won26%38%Games held12 of 1515 of 15Break points saved3 of 63 of 3Aces510Double faults43 | |||||||
| 2026-08-14 | Brownsburg (Usa) - Qualification | Hard | R. Sakamoto | 3.06 | 68% | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 6-3 MilavskySakamotoPoints won58%42%Serve points won70%55%Return points won45%30%Games held9 of 96 of 9Break points saved5 of 52 of 5Aces54Double faults34 | |||||||
| 2026-08-13 | Brownsburg (Usa) - Qualification | Hard | E. Butvilas | 2.77 | 65% | WON | |
Games in each set7-6 7-5 MilavskyButvilasPoints won51%49%Serve points won57%58%Return points won42%43%Games held8 of 127 of 12Break points saved6 of 102 of 7Aces66Double faults23 | |||||||
| 2026-08-11 | Brownsburg (Usa) - Qualification | Hard | F. Balshaw | 1.94 | 51% | WON | |
Games in each set5-7 7-5 7-6 MilavskyBalshawPoints won52%48%Serve points won61%56%Return points won44%39%Games held12 of 1812 of 18Break points saved4 of 106 of 12Aces109Double faults36 | |||||||
Dar. Blanch — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-20 | Fort Worth (Usa) | Hard | A. Pedrico Kravtsov | 1.19 | 80% | WON | |
Games in each set6-4 7-5 BlanchKravtsovPoints won54%46%Serve points won73%66%Return points won34%27%Games held11 of 119 of 11Break points saved3 of 32 of 4Aces100Double faults02 | |||||||
| 2026-10-02 | Columbus | Hard (Indoor) | D. Dietrich | 2.29 | 58% | LOST | |
Games in each set3-6 3-6 BlanchDietrichPoints won43%57%Serve points won55%71%Return points won29%45%Games held5 of 98 of 9Break points saved6 of 103 of 4Aces99Double faults12 | |||||||
| 2026-09-30 | Columbus | Hard (Indoor) | D. Milavsky | 1.44 | 65% | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 1-6 6-3 BlanchMilavskyPoints won49%51%Serve points won57%62%Return points won38%43%Games held10 of 139 of 12Break points saved11 of 144 of 7Aces146Double faults43 | |||||||
| 2026-09-29 | Columbus | Hard (Indoor) | P. Maloney | 1.29 | 74% | WON | |
Games in each set6-4 7-5 BlanchMaloneyPoints won53%47%Serve points won78%65%Return points won35%22%Games held11 of 119 of 11Break points saved0 of 06 of 8Aces126Double faults13 | |||||||
| 2026-09-24 | San Diego 2 (Usa) - Qualification | Hard | A. Andrade | 1.48 | 65% | LOST | |
Games in each set6-3 3-6 5-7 BlanchAndradePoints won49%51%Serve points won64%66%Return points won34%36%Games held12 of 1513 of 15Break points saved7 of 108 of 10Aces114Double faults35 | |||||||
| 2026-09-21 | Tiburon | Hard | M. Mmoh | 1.96 | 50% | WON | |
Games in each set3-6 6-4 6-2 BlanchMmohPoints won55%45%Serve points won68%56%Return points won44%32%Games held11 of 149 of 13Break points saved4 of 77 of 11Aces66Double faults06 | |||||||
| 2026-09-21 | San Diego 2 (Usa) - Qualification | Hard | J.J. Wolf | 2.31 | 58% | WON | |
Games in each set4-6 7-6 6-1 BlanchWolfPoints won47%53%Serve points won59%67%Return points won33%41%Games held12 of 1510 of 14Break points saved3 of 63 of 7Aces64Double faults53 | |||||||
| 2026-09-19 | Tiburon | Hard | M. Zheng | 3.31 | 71% | WON | |
Games in each set7-6 7-6 BlanchZhengPoints won50%50%Serve points won64%67%Return points won33%36%Games held11 of 1211 of 12Break points saved7 of 82 of 3Aces115Double faults42 | |||||||
| 2026-09-18 | Tiburon | Hard | B. Nakashima | 1.55 | 61% | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 6-3 BlanchNakashimaPoints won54%46%Serve points won68%60%Return points won40%32%Games held9 of 96 of 9Break points saved0 of 05 of 8Aces25Double faults34 | |||||||
| 2026-09-17 | Tiburon | Hard | F. A. Gomez | 1.50 | 63% | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 6-0 BlanchGomezPoints won66%34%Serve points won77%45%Return points won55%23%Games held8 of 83 of 7Break points saved0 of 05 of 9Aces35Double faults34 | |||||||
Common questions
What is the head-to-head between Daniel Milavsky and Darwin Blanch?
They have met 1 time and Darwin Blanch leads 1-0.