ChallengerHard (Indoor)Sioux Falls2026-10-26 16:00
Braden Shick v Max Hans Rehberg
The market
No published price yet
Percentages are the implied chance of winning with the bookmaker's margin removed.
Head to head
First career meetingNo previous matches between these two on record.
This season & this event
B. Shick
M. H. Rehberg
43-18
39-15
Did not play
Did not play
2026 record
2026 on hard
Here in 2025
Here in 2024
47-24
16-8
Did not play
Did not play
Ranking points fall off a year after they are earned, so a player who went deep here last year must match it or drop in the rankings. That shapes effort in a way the price does not always show.
The players
Braden Shick
USA

Max Hans Rehberg
Germany
207
23
USA
42–17
5
40–14
2–2
0–1
Ranking
Age
Country
2026 W/L
Titles
Hard
Clay
Grass
558
23
Germany
5–0
1
5–0
—
—
Ranking, record and surface splits are for the most recent season on file. Height, weight and handedness are not published by our data provider.
B. Shick — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-19 | Fort Worth (Usa) | Hard | G. Debru | 2.01 | 52% | LOST | |
Games in each set6-2 2-6 2-6 ShickDebruPoints won45%55%Serve points won56%66%Return points won34%44%Games held8 of 1210 of 12Break points saved2 of 63 of 5Aces28Double faults13 | |||||||
| 2026-09-30 | Columbus | Hard (Indoor) | M. Rottgering | 2.50 | 62% | LOST | |
Games in each set1-6 4-6 ShickRottgeringPoints won36%64%Serve points won40%70%Return points won30%60%Games held3 of 96 of 8Break points saved7 of 130 of 2Aces32Double faults44 | |||||||
| 2026-09-28 | Columbus | Hard (Indoor) | O. Baris | 1.73 | 54% | WON | |
Games in each set7-6 0-6 6-3 ShickBarisPoints won48%52%Serve points won64%67%Return points won33%36%Games held10 of 1411 of 13Break points saved2 of 63 of 5Aces1013Double faults06 | |||||||
| 2026-09-21 | San Diego 2 (Usa) - Qualification | Hard | P. Maloney | 1.40 | 68% | LOST | |
Games in each set3-6 6-7 ShickMaloneyPoints won49%51%Serve points won64%67%Return points won33%36%Games held9 of 1110 of 10Break points saved7 of 91 of 1Aces65Double faults63 | |||||||
| 2026-09-16 | Tiburon | Hard | J.J. Wolf | 3.60 | 74% | LOST | |
Games in each set4-6 7-6 4-6 ShickWolfPoints won48%52%Serve points won63%66%Return points won34%37%Games held13 of 1615 of 16Break points saved9 of 125 of 6Aces36Double faults32 | |||||||
| 2026-09-15 | Tiburon | Hard | E. Arutiunian | 1.47 | 63% | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 6-4 ShickArutiunianPoints won57%43%Serve points won75%62%Return points won38%25%Games held9 of 106 of 9Break points saved1 of 24 of 7Aces37Double faults11 | |||||||
| 2026-08-25 | US Open | Hard | C. Tabur | 2.24 | 57% | WON | |
Games in each set6-4 7-5 ShickTaburPoints won52%48%Serve points won64%63%Return points won37%36%Games held10 of 118 of 11Break points saved11 of 128 of 11Aces114Double faults12 | |||||||
| 2026-07-30 | Vancouver | Hard | A. Andrade | — | — | WON | |
Games in each set6-2 6-3 ShickAndradePoints won59%41%Serve points won68%51%Return points won49%32%Games held8 of 94 of 8Break points saved2 of 32 of 6Aces72Double faults25 | |||||||
| 2026-07-30 | Vancouver | Hard | M. Lajal | 3.72 | 74% | LOST | |
Games in each set2-6 2-6 ShickLajalPoints won41%59%Serve points won52%71%Return points won29%48%Games held4 of 88 of 8Break points saved3 of 70 of 0Aces38Double faults32 | |||||||
| 2026-07-29 | Vancouver | Hard | A. Holmgren | 2.88 | 66% | WON | |
Games in each set6-7 6-3 6-3 ShickHolmgrenPoints won54%46%Serve points won73%64%Return points won36%27%Games held15 of 1512 of 15Break points saved1 of 17 of 10Aces39Double faults78 | |||||||
M. H. Rehberg — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-19 | Fort Worth (Usa) | Hard | M. Rottgering | 2.16 | 56% | LOST | |
Games in each set2-6 1-6 RehbergRottgeringPoints won38%62%Serve points won47%76%Return points won24%53%Games held3 of 87 of 7Break points saved6 of 110 of 0Aces36Double faults22 | |||||||
| 2026-10-08 | Villena | Clay | H. Barton | 1.75 | 55% | LOST | |
Games in each set1-6 7-6 6-7 RehbergBartonPoints won46%54%Serve points won63%75%Return points won25%37%Games held13 of 1615 of 15Break points saved7 of 105 of 5Aces29Double faults65 | |||||||
| 2026-10-06 | Villena | Clay | E. Butvilas | 2.45 | 60% | WON | |
Games in each set1-6 6-4 7-5 RehbergButvilasPoints won49%51%Serve points won61%63%Return points won37%39%Games held10 of 1411 of 15Break points saved2 of 60 of 4Aces12Double faults30 | |||||||
| 2026-10-05 | Villena | Clay | M. Poljicak | 1.54 | 62% | WON | |
Games in each set5-7 6-3 6-3 RehbergPoljicakPoints won54%46%Serve points won72%62%Return points won38%28%Games held13 of 1511 of 15Break points saved3 of 52 of 6Aces812Double faults23 | |||||||
| 2026-10-04 | Villena | Clay | D. Cukierman | 1.07 | 89% | WON | |
Games in each set6-7 6-3 6-3 RehbergCukiermanPoints won52%48%Serve points won59%56%Return points won44%41%Games held12 of 159 of 15Break points saved1 of 44 of 10Aces107Double faults49 | |||||||
| 2026-09-19 | M25 Santa Margherita di Pula 7 | Clay | A. Chepelev | — | — | WON | |
Games in each set6-0 6-1 RehbergChepelevPoints won65%35%Serve points won65%36%Return points won64%35%Games held6 of 70 of 6Break points saved4 of 54 of 10 | |||||||
| 2026-09-18 | M25 Santa Margherita di Pula 7 | Clay | E. Vanshelboim | 1.14 | 80% | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 6-2 RehbergVanshelboimPoints won58%42%Serve points won61%45%Return points won55%39%Games held7 of 93 of 9Break points saved7 of 94 of 9 | |||||||
| 2026-09-17 | M25 Santa Margherita di Pula 7 | Clay | A. Weis | 1.23 | 75% | WON | |
Games in each set3-6 6-4 6-0 RehbergWeisPoints won57%43%Serve points won70%53%Return points won47%30%Games held10 of 128 of 13Break points saved3 of 54 of 9 | |||||||
| 2026-09-16 | M25 Santa Margherita di Pula 7 | Clay | G. Misasi | 1.01 | 90% | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 6-2 RehbergMisasiPoints won59%41%Serve points won64%47%Return points won53%36%Games held7 of 93 of 8Break points saved1 of 34 of 9 | |||||||
| 2026-09-15 | M25 Santa Margherita di Pula 7 | Clay | N. Catini | 1.06 | 90% | WON | |
Games in each set6-4 6-4 RehbergCatiniPoints won54%46%Serve points won59%51%Return points won49%41%Games held7 of 105 of 10Break points saved4 of 76 of 11 | |||||||