ChallengerHard (Indoor)Sioux Falls2026-10-26 16:00

Jenson Brooksby v Bryce Nakashima

The market

No published price yet

Percentages are the implied chance of winning with the bookmaker's margin removed.

Recent form

J. BrooksbyWWWWL

B. NakashimaLWLWW

Last five completed matches, most recent first.

Head to head

First career meetingNo previous matches between these two on record.

This season & this event

J. Brooksby

B. Nakashima

19-24

16-17

Did not play

2026 record

2026 on hard

Here in 2025

Here in 2024

21-8

Did not play

Ranking points fall off a year after they are earned, so a player who went deep here last year must match it or drop in the rankings. That shapes effort in a way the price does not always show.

The players

Jenson Brooksby

USA

Bryce Nakashima

USA

101

USA

14–23

10–13

0–6

4–4

Ranking

Age

Country

2026 W/L

Titles

Hard

Clay

Grass

872

USA

16–6

—

Ranking, record and surface splits are for the most recent season on file. Height, weight and handedness are not published by our data provider.

J. Brooksby — last 10

With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.

Date	Event	Surface	Opponent	Their price	Market	Result
2026-10-24	Fort Worth (Usa)	Hard	G. Debru	1.20	80%	WON
Games in each set6-7 6-3 6-2 BrooksbyDebruPoints won54%46%Serve points won69%62%Return points won38%31%Games held15 of 1511 of 14Break points saved3 of 35 of 8Aces18Double faults15
2026-10-23	Fort Worth (Usa)	Hard	P. Maloney	1.12	86%	WON
Games in each set6-4 6-2 BrooksbyMaloneyPoints won60%40%Serve points won76%55%Return points won45%24%Games held9 of 96 of 9Break points saved2 of 22 of 5Aces72Double faults12
2026-10-21	Fort Worth (Usa)	Hard	T. Legout	1.35	71%	WON
Games in each set6-2 6-4 BrooksbyLegoutPoints won56%44%Serve points won59%47%Return points won53%41%Games held7 of 94 of 9Break points saved3 of 53 of 8Aces40Double faults23
2026-10-19	Fort Worth (Usa)	Hard	M. Krueger	1.12	85%	WON
Games in each set3-6 6-3 6-2 BrooksbyKruegerPoints won54%46%Serve points won74%61%Return points won39%26%Games held12 of 1310 of 13Break points saved2 of 35 of 8Aces31Double faults41
2026-10-10	Shanghai	Hard	A. Davidovich Fokina	2.97	67%	LOST
Games in each set1-6 3-6 BrooksbyFokinaPoints won41%59%Serve points won48%66%Return points won34%52%Games held3 of 87 of 8Break points saved3 of 81 of 2Aces15Double faults10
2026-10-07	Shanghai	Hard	J. Munar	2.55	62%	WON
Games in each set7-5 6-4 BrooksbyMunarPoints won56%44%Serve points won69%55%Return points won45%31%Games held9 of 117 of 11Break points saved3 of 57 of 11Aces33Double faults03
2026-09-27	Chengdu	Hard	N. Basilashvili	1.84	53%	LOST
Games in each set4-6 6-7 BrooksbyBasilashviliPoints won46%54%Serve points won60%70%Return points won30%40%Games held9 of 1110 of 11Break points saved5 of 70 of 1Aces39Double faults21
2026-09-25	Chengdu	Hard	L. Sonego	1.78	54%	WON
Games in each set5-7 7-5 6-2 BrooksbySonegoPoints won55%45%Serve points won69%59%Return points won41%31%Games held14 of 1612 of 16Break points saved4 of 62 of 6Aces74Double faults13
2026-09-23	Chengdu	Hard	S. Baez	1.64	59%	WON
Games in each set7-5 7-5 BrooksbyBaezPoints won53%47%Serve points won72%68%Return points won32%28%Games held12 of 1210 of 12Break points saved2 of 20 of 2Aces17Double faults10
2026-08-30	US Open	Hard	J. Faria	1.84	53%	LOST
Games in each set3-6 6-7 6-4 6-1 2-6 BrooksbyFariaPoints won50%50%Serve points won60%60%Return points won40%40%Games held16 of 2217 of 24Break points saved5 of 119 of 16Aces614Double faults314

B. Nakashima — last 10

With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.

Date	Event	Surface	Opponent	Their price	Market	Result
2026-10-01	Columbus	Hard (Indoor)	K. Smith	1.98	53%	LOST
Games in each set4-6 6-3 5-7 NakashimaSmithPoints won50%50%Serve points won66%69%Return points won31%34%Games held13 of 1613 of 15Break points saved11 of 147 of 9Aces717Double faults21
2026-09-29	Columbus	Hard (Indoor)	J. Kennedy	1.61	58%	WON
Games in each set4-6 6-2 7-6 NakashimaKennedyPoints won52%48%Serve points won63%58%Return points won42%37%Games held12 of 1511 of 15Break points saved6 of 912 of 16Aces122Double faults11
2026-09-18	Tiburon	Hard	Dar. Blanch	2.40	61%	LOST
Games in each set3-6 3-6 NakashimaBlanchPoints won46%54%Serve points won60%68%Return points won32%40%Games held6 of 99 of 9Break points saved5 of 80 of 0Aces52Double faults43
2026-09-16	Tiburon	Hard	T. Legout	2.40	62%	WON
Games in each set7-6 6-2 NakashimaLegoutPoints won55%45%Serve points won68%58%Return points won42%32%Games held9 of 107 of 10Break points saved6 of 74 of 7Aces110Double faults13
2026-09-15	Tiburon	Hard	A. Ilagan	2.37	60%	WON
Games in each set7-5 6-7 7-6 NakashimaIlaganPoints won49%51%Serve points won67%68%Return points won32%33%Games held17 of 1816 of 18Break points saved4 of 55 of 7Aces1615Double faults65
2026-09-14	Tiburon	Hard	Q. Vandecasteele	2.09	54%	WON
Games in each set6-2 6-4 NakashimaVandecasteelePoints won55%45%Serve points won62%51%Return points won49%38%Games held7 of 94 of 9Break points saved3 of 510 of 15Aces36Double faults42
2026-09-13	Tiburon	Hard	K. Bigun	1.71	54%	WON
Games in each set7-5 6-0 NakashimaBigunPoints won61%39%Serve points won71%49%Return points won51%29%Games held8 of 94 of 9Break points saved2 of 32 of 7Aces51Double faults16
2026-08-30	M15 Champaign, IL	Hard	J. Vrba	1.25	76%	WON
Games in each set6-2 7-6 NakashimaVrbaPoints won56%44%Serve points won66%53%Return points won47%34%Games held8 of 106 of 10Break points saved1 of 32 of 6
2026-08-29	M15 Champaign, IL	Hard	P. Stearns	1.41	67%	WON
Games in each set6-2 7-6 NakashimaStearnsPoints won51%49%Serve points won68%63%Return points won37%32%Games held10 of 108 of 10Break points saved3 of 30 of 2
2026-08-28	M15 Champaign, IL	Hard	J. Anthrop	2.12	55%	WON
Games in each set6-3 6-4 NakashimaAnthropPoints won56%44%Serve points won63%53%Return points won47%37%Games held8 of 105 of 9Break points saved3 of 55 of 9

Also at this event

Dietrich v Smith Galarneau v Rottgering Gorzny v Blanch Kozlov v Cassone Krueger v Andrade Martin v Bigun