Botic Van De Zandschulp v Jie Cui
Match preview, prediction and odds
Our pick
LeanWONB. Van De Zandschulp is 7-3 over the last ten and 15-13 on hard this season. J. Cui is 4-6 over the last ten and 23-20 on hard this season.
The pick is B. Van De Zandschulp to win. We make it a 81% chance, so it is only worth backing at 1.24 or bigger. At 1.17 that is not there yet - leave it, or wait for the price to drift in-play (an early break against usually does it).
An opinion from the numbers, not a guarantee. 19+, bet responsibly.
Key numbers
| B. Van De Zandschulp | J. Cui | |
|---|---|---|
| 40 | Ranking | 456 |
| 7-3 | Last 10 | 4-6 |
| WLWLW | Last 5 | WLLLW |
| +0.8 | V the odds | +0.1 |
| 26-22 | Season | 23-21 |
| 15-13 | Hard 2026 | 23-20 |
| 2 | Last 7 days | 2 |
| 1d | Days rest | 1d |
| 1 | Wins here | 1 |
| Clear | Fitness | Clear |
| Head to head First meeting |
V the odds: wins above (or below) what the prices expected over the last 10 - form with the strength of the opposition built in.
The market
Percentages are the implied chance of winning with the bookmaker's margin removed.
Head to head
| Date | Event | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-29 | Beijing | B. Van De ZandschulpvJ. Cui | 2 - 0 |
This season & this event
Ranking points fall off a year after they are earned, so a player who went deep here last year must match it or drop in the rankings. That shapes effort in a way the price does not always show.
The players
Ranking, record and surface splits are for the most recent season on file. Height, weight and handedness are not published by our data provider.
B. Van De Zandschulp — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-29 | Beijing | Hard | J. Cui | 2 - 0 | 1.20 | 79% | WON |
| 2026-09-28 | Beijing | Hard | V. Royer | 2 - 1 | 1.52 | 63% | WON |
| 2026-09-25 | Chengdu | Hard | N. Basilashvili | 2 - 0 | 1.52 | 64% | LOST |
| 2026-09-18 | ATP Davis Cup - World Group I | - Preliminary | J. A. Rodriguez | 2 - 1 | — | — | WON |
| 2026-09-09 | US Open | Hard | A. Zverev | 3 - 0 | 7.33 | 87% | LOST |
| 2026-09-07 | US Open | Hard | A. Gea | 2 - 3 | 1.65 | 59% | WON |
| 2026-09-05 | US Open | Hard | Z. Bergs | 2 - 3 | 1.54 | 63% | WON |
| 2026-09-01 | US Open | Hard | J. Choinski | 0 - 3 | 1.26 | 77% | WON |
| 2026-08-27 | Winston-Salem | Hard | B. Bonzi | 2 - 0 | 1.51 | 65% | LOST |
| 2026-08-26 | Winston-Salem | Hard | L. Darderi | 2 - 0 | 1.66 | 58% | WON |
J. Cui — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-29 | Beijing | Hard | B. Van De Zandschulp | 2 - 0 | 4.57 | 79% | LOST |
| 2026-09-28 | Beijing | Hard | D. Altmaier | 2 - 0 | 3.15 | 70% | WON |
| 2026-09-23 | Hangzhou | Hard | D. Vallejo | 1 - 2 | 3.36 | 71% | LOST |
| 2026-09-18 | ATP Davis Cup - World Group I | - Preliminary | N. Budkov Kjaer | 2 - 1 | 12.00 | 92% | LOST |
| 2026-09-09 | Shanghai | Hard | Y. Zhou | 0 - 2 | 2.68 | 64% | LOST |
| 2026-09-08 | Shanghai | Hard | F. Sun | 2 - 0 | 2.30 | 60% | WON |
| 2026-08-31 | Zhangjiagang | Hard | J. K. Trotter | 0 - 2 | 1.78 | 54% | LOST |
| 2026-08-14 | Astana | Hard | A. Dougaz | 1 - 2 | 2.70 | 66% | LOST |
| 2026-08-13 | Astana | Hard | P. Bar Biryukov | 0 - 2 | 2.60 | 63% | WON |
| 2026-08-11 | Astana | Hard | A. Ouakaa | 0 - 2 | 1.39 | 69% | WON |
Common questions
Who is favourite, Botic Van De Zandschulp or Jie Cui?
Botic Van De Zandschulp is favourite at 1.20, which is a 79% chance once the bookmaker's margin is removed.
What are the odds for Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Jie Cui?
Botic Van De Zandschulp is 1.20 and Jie Cui is 4.57, the prices we recorded for the Beijing match.
What is the head-to-head between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Jie Cui?
They have met 1 time and Botic Van De Zandschulp leads 1-0.
Who will win Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Jie Cui?
Our model makes it Botic Van De Zandschulp to win at 1.17 (Lean confidence).