ITFHardW15 Villena · 1/16-finals2026-10-20 10:00
Adriana Monlleo Ramos v Vicky Van De Peer
The market
No published price yet
Percentages are the implied chance of winning with the bookmaker's margin removed.
Head to head
First career meetingNo previous matches between these two on record.
This season & this event
A. Monlleo Ramos
V. Van De Peer
2-4
1-1
Did not play
Did not play
2026 record
2026 on hard
Here in 2025
Here in 2024
4-7
0-0
Did not play
Did not play
Ranking points fall off a year after they are earned, so a player who went deep here last year must match it or drop in the rankings. That shapes effort in a way the price does not always show.
The players
Adriana Monlleo Ramos
Spain

Vicky Van De Peer
Belgium
—
17
Spain
1–4
0
1–1
0–3
—
Ranking
Age
Country
2025 W/L
Titles
Hard
Clay
Grass
710
25
Belgium
20–18
0
7–5
13–13
—
Ranking, record and surface splits are for the most recent season on file. Height, weight and handedness are not published by our data provider.
A. Monlleo Ramos — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-03 | W15 Badalona (Spain) | Clay | M. Argyrokastriti | — | — | LOST | |
Games in each set2-6 2-6 RamosArgyrokastritiPoints won38%62%Serve points won44%70%Return points won30%56%Games held3 of 87 of 8Break points saved3 of 80 of 1 | |||||||
| 2026-09-02 | W15 Badalona (Spain) | Clay | P. Ortega Redondo | 1.12 | 86% | WON | |
Games in each set6-2 6-1 RamosRedondoPoints won64%36%Serve points won62%34%Return points won66%38%Games held5 of 71 of 8Break points saved2 of 41 of 8 | |||||||
| 2026-08-27 | W15 Torello | Hard | K. Hui | — | — | LOST | |
Games in each set3-6 3-6 RamosHuiPoints won37%63%Serve points won25%53%Return points won47%75%Games held2 of 95 of 9Break points saved3 of 103 of 7 | |||||||
| 2026-08-26 | W15 Torello | Hard | L. Ollich | — | — | WON | |
Games in each set6-2 7-5 | |||||||
| 2026-06-03 | W15 Ontinyent (Spain) | Clay | C. Anson Sanchez | 4.87 | 80% | LOST | |
Games in each set3-6 4-6 | |||||||
| 2026-05-26 | W15 Oliva (Spain) | Clay | V. Pohle | 6.08 | 84% | LOST | |
Games in each set2-6 4-6 | |||||||
V. Van De Peer — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-09 | W15 Dijon | Clay | G. M. Dittmann | — | — | LOST | |
Games in each set6-7 5-7 PeerDittmannPoints won47%53%Serve points won48%54%Return points won46%52%Games held6 of 127 of 12Break points saved5 of 112 of 7 | |||||||
| 2026-09-08 | W15 Dijon | Clay | A. Easwaramurthi | 1.01 | 97% | WON | |
Games in each set6-2 6-1 PeerEaswaramurthiPoints won65%35%Serve points won64%34%Return points won66%36%Games held6 of 81 of 7Break points saved1 of 34 of 9 | |||||||
| 2026-09-03 | W15 Haren | Clay | M. Horvit | 2.85 | 68% | LOST | |
Games in each set4-6 0-6 PeerHorvitPoints won41%59%Serve points won48%67%Return points won33%52%Games held4 of 88 of 8Break points saved7 of 116 of 6 | |||||||
| 2026-09-02 | W15 Haren | Clay | C. Pikkaart | 1.41 | 68% | WON | |
Games in each set6-4 6-1 PeerPikkaartPoints won100%0% | |||||||
| 2026-08-20 | W35 Verbier | Clay | A. Grubor | 2.82 | 66% | LOST | |
Games in each set6-7 2-6 PeerGruborPoints won44%56%Serve points won49%60%Return points won40%51%Games held5 of 118 of 11Break points saved5 of 104 of 7 | |||||||
| 2026-08-19 | W35 Verbier | Clay | S. Schnyder | 1.87 | 51% | WON | |
Games in each set4-6 6-4 6-4 PeerSchnyderPoints won51%49%Serve points won60%58%Return points won42%40%Games held11 of 1510 of 15Break points saved8 of 129 of 14 | |||||||
| 2026-08-06 | W15 Hameenlinna | Clay | R. Gailis | 3.03 | 69% | LOST | |
Games in each set4-6 0-6 | |||||||
| 2026-08-05 | W15 Hameenlinna | Clay | B. Stagno | 1.70 | 56% | WON | |
Games in each set7-6 6-4 | |||||||
| 2026-07-29 | W15 Rogaska Slatina | Clay | A. Senica | 2.76 | 65% | LOST | |
Games in each set3-6 6-7 | |||||||
| 2026-06-24 | W15 Kamen | Clay | D. Ciobanu | 1.49 | 64% | LOST | |
Games in each set4-6 4-6 | |||||||