ChallengerClayGuayaquil2026-10-25 16:00
S. Castro Loedel v Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez
The market
No published price yet
Percentages are the implied chance of winning with the bookmaker's margin removed.
Head to head
First career meetingNo previous matches between these two on record.
This season & this event
S. Castro Loedel
L. J. Rodriguez
0-2
0-2
Did not play
Did not play
2026 record
2026 on clay
Here in 2025
Here in 2024
29-23
27-20
Did not play
Did not play
Ranking points fall off a year after they are earned, so a player who went deep here last year must match it or drop in the rankings. That shapes effort in a way the price does not always show.
The players
S. Castro Loedel
Ecuador

Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez
Argentina
—
56
Ecuador
—
—
—
—
—
Ranking
Age
Country
2026 W/L
Titles
Hard
Clay
Grass
538
27
Argentina
28–21
0
—
28–21
—
Ranking, record and surface splits are for the most recent season on file. Height, weight and handedness are not published by our data provider.
S. Castro Loedel — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-28 | M15 Quito 2 | Clay | V. H. Remondy Pagotto | — | — | LOST | |
Games in each set2-6 1-6 | |||||||
| 2026-04-22 | M15 Quito | Clay | H. Ortenblad Nogueira | — | — | LOST | |
Games in each set4-6 0-6 | |||||||
L. J. Rodriguez — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-12 | Santa Cruz 2 | Clay | T. Cigarran | 1.41 | 67% | LOST | |
Games in each set4-6 4-6 RodriguezCigarranPoints won47%53%Serve points won51%58%Return points won42%49%Games held5 of 107 of 10Break points saved8 of 133 of 6Aces40Double faults53 | |||||||
| 2026-10-11 | Santa Cruz 2 | Clay | A. E. Cuellar Lorberg | — | — | WON | |
Games in each set6-4 6-1 RodriguezLorbergPoints won60%40%Serve points won69%50%Return points won50%31%Games held8 of 94 of 8Break points saved1 of 21 of 5Aces31Double faults02 | |||||||
| 2026-10-05 | Antofagasta | Clay | J. Aguilar Cardozo | 5.24 | 82% | LOST | |
Games in each set3-6 6-0 3-6 RodriguezCardozoPoints won49%51%Serve points won59%57%Return points won43%41%Games held8 of 128 of 12Break points saved5 of 99 of 13Aces01Double faults14 | |||||||
| 2026-10-04 | Antofagasta | Clay | F. Ribero | 1.17 | 79% | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 6-2 RodriguezRiberoPoints won58%42%Serve points won73%57%Return points won43%27%Games held9 of 95 of 8Break points saved1 of 12 of 5Aces00Double faults15 | |||||||
| 2026-09-29 | Curitiba | Clay | T. Barrios Vera | 3.40 | 72% | LOST | |
Games in each set1-6 1-6 RodriguezVeraPoints won35%65%Serve points won44%80%Return points won20%56%Games held2 of 77 of 7Break points saved7 of 120 of 0Aces31Double faults31 | |||||||
| 2026-09-28 | Curitiba | Clay | W. Leite | 1.20 | 77% | WON | |
Games in each set6-1 7-6 RodriguezLeitePoints won60%40%Serve points won75%56%Return points won44%25%Games held9 of 106 of 9Break points saved4 of 50 of 3Aces42Double faults15 | |||||||
| 2026-09-27 | Curitiba | Clay | B. Milani | — | — | WON | |
Games in each set6-0 6-2 RodriguezMilaniPoints won73%27%Serve points won90%42%Return points won58%10%Games held7 of 72 of 7Break points saved0 of 02 of 7Aces30Double faults04 | |||||||
| 2026-09-22 | Buenos Aires 3 | Clay | J. C. Prado Angelo | — | — | LOST | |
Games in each set6-7 6-7 RodriguezAngeloPoints won48%52%Serve points won57%62%Return points won38%43%Games held8 of 128 of 12Break points saved0 of 41 of 5Aces10Double faults10 | |||||||
| 2026-09-21 | Buenos Aires 3 | Clay | B. Malla | RET | 1.67 | 56% | WON |
Games in each set6-2 1-0 RodriguezMallaPoints won63%37%Serve points won80%54%Return points won46%20%Games held5 of 52 of 4Break points saved0 of 02 of 4Aces20Double faults01 | |||||||
| 2026-09-20 | Buenos Aires 3 | Clay | T. Meneo | 1.04 | 91% | WON | |
Games in each set6-4 6-2 RodriguezMeneoPoints won55%45%Serve points won64%51%Return points won49%36%Games held8 of 95 of 9Break points saved4 of 57 of 11Aces12Double faults25 | |||||||