ATPHard (Indoor)Lyon (France) - Qualification2026-10-22 10:00
Kyrian Jacquet v Brandon Nakashima
The market
No published price yet
Percentages are the implied chance of winning with the bookmaker's margin removed.
Head to head
First career meetingNo previous matches between these two on record.
This season & this event
K. Jacquet
B. Nakashima
36-19
21-9
Did not play
Did not play
2026 record
2026 on hard
Here in 2025
Here in 2024
38-21
32-16
Did not play
Did not play
Ranking points fall off a year after they are earned, so a player who went deep here last year must match it or drop in the rankings. That shapes effort in a way the price does not always show.
No previous edition of this event found in the feed.
The players

Kyrian Jacquet
France

Brandon Nakashima
USA
76
25
France
32–18
1
17–9
8–6
7–3
Ranking
Age
Country
2026 W/L
Titles
Hard
Clay
Grass
18
25
USA
33–19
0
24–12
5–5
4–2
Ranking, record and surface splits are for the most recent season on file. Height, weight and handedness are not published by our data provider.
K. Jacquet — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-20 | Lyon (France) - Qualification | Hard (Indoor) | M. Berrettini | 2.19 | 56% | WON | |
Games in each set7-6 7-5 JacquetBerrettiniPoints won52%48%Serve points won70%71%Return points won29%30%Games held12 of 1211 of 12Break points saved5 of 50 of 1Aces1613Double faults01 | |||||||
| 2026-10-19 | Lyon (France) - Qualification | Hard (Indoor) | M. Mmoh | RET | 1.43 | 67% | WON |
Games in each set7-6 JacquetMmohPoints won54%46%Serve points won68%64%Return points won36%32%Games held5 of 65 of 6Break points saved0 of 10 of 1Aces43Double faults01 | |||||||
| 2026-10-18 | Lyon (France) - Qualification | Hard (Indoor) | S. Gueymard Wayenburg | 1.71 | 56% | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 7-5 JacquetWayenburgPoints won56%44%Serve points won68%56%Return points won44%32%Games held9 of 116 of 10Break points saved2 of 45 of 9Aces77Double faults01 | |||||||
| 2026-10-06 | Shanghai | Hard | R. Sakamoto | 1.69 | 57% | LOST | |
Games in each set6-7 6-4 6-7 JacquetSakamotoPoints won51%49%Serve points won73%68%Return points won32%27%Games held16 of 1715 of 17Break points saved5 of 67 of 9Aces813Double faults04 | |||||||
| 2026-10-05 | Shanghai | Hard | T. Zhang | 1.03 | 94% | WON | |
Games in each set6-2 7-6 JacquetZhangPoints won58%42%Serve points won79%58%Return points won42%21%Games held9 of 107 of 10Break points saved0 of 15 of 8Aces62Double faults31 | |||||||
| 2026-10-04 | Tokyo | Hard | J. Munar | 2.28 | 57% | LOST | |
Games in each set4-6 2-6 JacquetMunarPoints won45%55%Serve points won57%66%Return points won34%43%Games held6 of 99 of 9Break points saved4 of 74 of 4Aces13Double faults12 | |||||||
| 2026-10-02 | Tokyo | Hard | L. Darderi | 2.15 | 56% | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 7-6 JacquetDarderiPoints won55%45%Serve points won79%64%Return points won36%21%Games held11 of 119 of 10Break points saved0 of 05 of 6Aces151Double faults10 | |||||||
| 2026-09-30 | Tokyo | Hard | H. Rune | 2.53 | 62% | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 6-1 JacquetRunePoints won62%38%Serve points won75%52%Return points won48%25%Games held8 of 84 of 8Break points saved0 of 02 of 6Aces33Double faults30 | |||||||
| 2026-09-28 | Hangzhou | Hard | A. Rublev | — | — | LOST | |
Games in each set6-7 1-6 JacquetRublevPoints won42%58%Serve points won63%80%Return points won20%37%Games held7 of 910 of 10Break points saved5 of 70 of 0Aces65Double faults11 | |||||||
| 2026-09-27 | Hangzhou | Hard | F. Marozsan | 2.07 | 53% | WON | |
Games in each set7-6 6-4 JacquetMarozsanPoints won51%49%Serve points won70%70%Return points won30%30%Games held11 of 1110 of 11Break points saved3 of 31 of 2Aces63Double faults51 | |||||||
B. Nakashima — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-19 | Lyon (France) - Qualification | Hard (Indoor) | H. Medjedovic | 1.36 | 71% | WON | |
Games in each set7-6 6-7 6-2 NakashimaMedjedovicPoints won53%47%Serve points won79%74%Return points won26%21%Games held16 of 1614 of 16Break points saved2 of 23 of 5Aces2714Double faults03 | |||||||
| 2026-10-12 | Shanghai | Hard | A. Bublik | 1.87 | 52% | LOST | |
Games in each set7-6 3-6 6-7 NakashimaBublikPoints won45%55%Serve points won70%81%Return points won19%30%Games held15 of 1617 of 17Break points saved0 of 10 of 0Aces1222Double faults22 | |||||||
| 2026-10-10 | Shanghai | Hard | M. Berrettini | 1.64 | 59% | WON | |
Games in each set7-6 7-5 NakashimaBerrettiniPoints won51%49%Serve points won75%75%Return points won25%25%Games held12 of 1211 of 12Break points saved3 of 33 of 4Aces512Double faults14 | |||||||
| 2026-09-30 | Tokyo | Hard | U. Humbert | 1.48 | 66% | LOST | |
Games in each set3-6 2-6 NakashimaHumbertPoints won36%64%Serve points won52%88%Return points won12%48%Games held5 of 89 of 9Break points saved9 of 120 of 0Aces16Double faults21 | |||||||
| 2026-09-25 | ATP Laver Cup | Hard (Indoor) | J. Mensik | 2.27 | 57% | WON | |
Games in each set6-1 3-6 10-7 NakashimaMensikPoints won53%47%Serve points won72%67%Return points won33%28%Games held7 of 86 of 8Break points saved1 of 21 of 3Aces32Double faults11 | |||||||
| 2026-09-02 | US Open | Hard | A. Michelsen | 1.45 | 67% | LOST | |
Games in each set3-6 4-6 4-6 NakashimaMichelsenPoints won44%56%Serve points won63%75%Return points won25%37%Games held10 of 1414 of 15Break points saved3 of 72 of 3Aces104Double faults44 | |||||||
| 2026-08-31 | US Open | Hard | S. Baez | 1.14 | 85% | WON | |
Games in each set6-2 6-1 6-0 NakashimaBaezPoints won67%33%Serve points won75%42%Return points won58%25%Games held11 of 113 of 10Break points saved3 of 34 of 11Aces120Double faults04 | |||||||
| 2026-08-23 | Cincinnati | Hard | F. Tiafoe | 1.88 | 52% | LOST | |
Games in each set5-7 3-6 NakashimaTiafoePoints won46%54%Serve points won54%61%Return points won39%46%Games held6 of 118 of 10Break points saved5 of 107 of 9Aces97Double faults25 | |||||||
| 2026-08-21 | Cincinnati | Hard | T. Fritz | 2.62 | 63% | WON | |
Games in each set7-6 4-6 6-3 NakashimaFritzPoints won50%50%Serve points won67%70%Return points won30%33%Games held14 of 1613 of 15Break points saved4 of 61 of 3Aces1322Double faults43 | |||||||
| 2026-08-20 | Cincinnati | Hard | N. Borges | 1.60 | 61% | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 6-7 6-3 NakashimaBorgesPoints won53%47%Serve points won69%64%Return points won36%31%Games held16 of 1612 of 14Break points saved4 of 47 of 9Aces278Double faults32 | |||||||