ChallengerClayCali · 1/16-finals2026-11-03 17:00
Katrina Scott v Renata Zarazua
The market
No published price yet
Percentages are the implied chance of winning with the bookmaker's margin removed.
Head to head
K. Scott2
R. Zarazua0
| Date | Event | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | ITF W100 Landisville, PA Women | R. ZarazuavK. Scott | 4-6 6-3 5-7 |
| 2023-10-31 | Midland Challenger Women | K. ScottvR. Zarazua | 7-6 4-6 6-2 |
This season & this event
K. Scott
R. Zarazua
16-19
6-5
Did not play
Did not play
2026 record
2026 on clay
Here in 2025
Here in 2024
36-34
7-6
Did not play
Did not play
Ranking points fall off a year after they are earned, so a player who went deep here last year must match it or drop in the rankings. That shapes effort in a way the price does not always show.
The players

Katrina Scott
USA

Renata Zarazua
Mexico
238
22
USA
16–16
0
11–13
5–2
0–1
Ranking
Age
Country
2026 W/L
Titles
Hard
Clay
Grass
85
29
Mexico
31–32
1
21–21
7–6
3–5
Ranking, record and surface splits are for the most recent season on file. Height, weight and handedness are not published by our data provider.
K. Scott — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-01 | Cali | Clay | M. Herazo Gonzalez | — | — | LOST | |
Games in each set6-7 4-6 ScottGonzalezPoints won45%55%Serve points won49%59%Return points won41%51%Games held6 of 117 of 11Break points saved4 of 94 of 8Aces11Double faults31 | |||||||
| 2026-10-26 | Queretaro | Clay | T. Zidansek | 4.80 | 80% | LOST | |
Games in each set1-6 2-6 ScottZidansekPoints won38%62%Serve points won45%70%Return points won30%55%Games held3 of 87 of 7Break points saved4 of 94 of 4Aces01Double faults43 | |||||||
| 2026-10-07 | W35 Las Vegas | Hard | L. Reed | RET | 1.32 | 72% | LOST |
Games in each set6-7 1-3 ScottReedPoints won45%55%Serve points won59%68%Return points won32%41%Games held5 of 88 of 10Break points saved1 of 41 of 3 | |||||||
| 2026-09-13 | Guadalajara | Clay | C. Monnet | 1.76 | 55% | LOST | |
Games in each set6-7 7-6 2-6 ScottMonnetPoints won48%52%Serve points won50%54%Return points won46%50%Games held8 of 1610 of 16Break points saved5 of 138 of 14Aces33Double faults610 | |||||||
| 2026-09-12 | Guadalajara | Clay | A. Panova | 1.02 | 90% | WON | |
Games in each set6-2 6-4 ScottPanovaPoints won56%44%Serve points won74%60%Return points won40%26%Games held9 of 96 of 9Break points saved0 of 04 of 7Aces115Double faults24 | |||||||
| 2026-09-07 | Barranquilla | Hard | V. Lepchenko | 1.97 | 52% | LOST | |
Games in each set6-7 1-6 ScottLepchenkoPoints won44%56%Serve points won61%70%Return points won30%39%Games held7 of 910 of 10Break points saved4 of 68 of 8Aces25Double faults73 | |||||||
| 2026-08-25 | US Open | Hard | K. Swan | 2.17 | 55% | LOST | |
Games in each set3-6 1-6 ScottSwanPoints won37%63%Serve points won47%72%Return points won28%53%Games held4 of 88 of 8Break points saved3 of 71 of 1Aces03Double faults10 | |||||||
| 2026-08-09 | W100 Landisville, PA | Hard | A. Zakharova | — | — | LOST | |
Games in each set2-6 1-6 | |||||||
| 2026-08-08 | W100 Landisville, PA | Hard | Y. Ma | — | — | WON | |
Games in each set6-2 6-1 | |||||||
| 2026-08-08 | W100 Landisville, PA | Hard | M. Hontama | — | — | WON | |
Games in each set6-2 6-2 | |||||||
R. Zarazua — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-31 | W100 New Braunfels | — | A. Urhobo | 1.81 | 53% | LOST | |
Games in each set6-7 4-6 ZarazuaUrhoboPoints won48%52%Serve points won47%50%Return points won50%53%Games held5 of 117 of 12Break points saved5 of 111 of 6 | |||||||
| 2026-10-29 | W100 New Braunfels | — | X. Gao | RET | — | — | WON |
Games in each set5-7 7-6 4-0 ZarazuaGaoPoints won53%47%Serve points won58%52%Return points won48%42%Games held9 of 148 of 14Break points saved7 of 121 of 7 | |||||||
| 2026-10-28 | W100 New Braunfels | — | L. Reed | 1.09 | 88% | WON | |
Games in each set0-6 6-4 6-4 ZarazuaReedPoints won48%52%Serve points won58%65%Return points won35%42%Games held10 of 1311 of 13Break points saved6 of 92 of 4 | |||||||
| 2026-10-17 | W100 Edmond, OK | Hard | Y. Ku | — | — | WON | |
Games in each set6-1 6-3 ZarazuaKuPoints won58%42%Serve points won56%40%Return points won60%44%Games held6 of 82 of 8Break points saved3 of 51 of 7 | |||||||
| 2026-10-17 | W100 Edmond, OK | Hard | K. Liutova | 2.50 | 62% | LOST | |
Games in each set1-6 3-6 ZarazuaLiutovaPoints won42%58%Serve points won44%59%Return points won41%56%Games held2 of 86 of 8Break points saved2 of 83 of 5 | |||||||
| 2026-10-16 | W100 Edmond, OK | Hard | T. Frodin | — | — | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 6-2 ZarazuaFrodinPoints won58%42%Serve points won55%39%Return points won61%45%Games held6 of 92 of 8Break points saved1 of 43 of 9 | |||||||
| 2026-10-14 | W100 Edmond, OK | Hard | S. Johnson | 1.43 | 67% | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 6-1 ZarazuaJohnsonPoints won61%39%Serve points won59%37%Return points won63%41%Games held5 of 81 of 8Break points saved1 of 44 of 11 | |||||||
| 2026-10-10 | Suzhou | Hard | R. Sramkova | 2.03 | 52% | LOST | |
Games in each set5-7 3-6 ZarazuaSramkovaPoints won45%55%Serve points won61%69%Return points won31%39%Games held7 of 1010 of 11Break points saved1 of 40 of 1Aces08Double faults20 | |||||||
| 2026-10-09 | Suzhou | Hard | K. Zavatska | 1.22 | 79% | WON | |
Games in each set6-1 7-6 ZarazuaZavatskaPoints won56%44%Serve points won55%43%Return points won57%45%Games held7 of 104 of 9Break points saved10 of 132 of 7Aces10Double faults11 | |||||||
| 2026-10-07 | Suzhou | Hard | D. Astakhova | RET | 1.45 | 66% | WON |
Games in each set4-0 ZarazuaAstakhovaPoints won77%23%Serve points won71%11%Return points won89%29%Games held2 of 20 of 2Break points saved1 of 10 of 2Aces10Double faults01 | |||||||
Common questions
What is the head-to-head between Katrina Scott and Renata Zarazua?
They have met 2 times and Katrina Scott leads 2-0.