ITFHardM15 Heraklion 92026-10-21 11:30
Jiri Cizek v Michel Hopp
Head to head
First career meetingNo previous matches between these two on record.
This season & this event
J. Cizek
M. Hopp
9-11
4-3
Did not play
Did not play
2026 record
2026 on hard
Here in 2025
Here in 2024
12-13
2-5
Did not play
Did not play
Ranking points fall off a year after they are earned, so a player who went deep here last year must match it or drop in the rankings. That shapes effort in a way the price does not always show.
The players

Jiri Cizek
Czech Republic

Michel Hopp
Germany
1822
21
Czech Republic
3–15
0
2–6
1–9
—
Ranking
Age
Country
2025 W/L
Titles
Hard
Clay
Grass
896
27
Germany
26–19
0
7–4
19–15
—
Ranking, record and surface splits are for the most recent season on file. Height, weight and handedness are not published by our data provider.
J. Cizek — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-07 | M15 Heraklion 7 | Hard | A. Vales | 3.45 | 72% | LOST | |
Games in each set3-6 1-6 CizekValesPoints won38%62%Serve points won50%76%Return points won24%50%Games held4 of 88 of 8Break points saved3 of 60 of 0 | |||||||
| 2026-09-26 | M25 Pardubice | Clay | S. Dominko | — | — | LOST | |
Games in each set0-6 2-6 CizekDominkoPoints won37%63%Serve points won45%74%Return points won26%55%Games held2 of 77 of 7Break points saved3 of 80 of 0 | |||||||
| 2026-09-26 | M25 Pardubice | Clay | C. Piening | 1.28 | 75% | WON | |
Games in each set6-1 3-6 7-6 CizekPieningPoints won51%49%Serve points won58%55%Return points won45%42%Games held10 of 158 of 14Break points saved6 of 115 of 11 | |||||||
| 2026-09-24 | M25 Pardubice | Clay | Pe. Tsitsipas | 1.57 | 59% | WON | |
Games in each set6-4 5-7 6-4 CizekTsitsipasPoints won51%49%Serve points won70%68%Return points won32%30%Games held15 of 1614 of 16Break points saved3 of 44 of 6 | |||||||
| 2026-09-22 | M25 Pardubice | Clay | D. Dujka | — | — | WON | |
Games in each set6-2 6-1 CizekDujkaPoints won64%36%Serve points won82%50%Return points won50%18%Games held8 of 83 of 7Break points saved0 of 04 of 8 | |||||||
| 2026-08-25 | M25 Poznan | Clay | G. Campana Lee | 5.90 | 84% | LOST | |
Games in each set6-3 2-6 1-6 CizekLeePoints won46%54%Serve points won58%65%Return points won35%42%Games held8 of 1211 of 12Break points saved4 of 83 of 4 | |||||||
| 2026-08-16 | Prague | Clay | N. Gombos | 8.10 | 89% | LOST | |
Games in each set6-7 3-6 CizekGombosPoints won44%56%Serve points won66%73%Return points won27%34%Games held9 of 1011 of 11Break points saved0 of 13 of 3Aces64Double faults21 | |||||||
| 2026-08-04 | Grodzisk Mazowiecki | Hard | J. J. Schwaerzler | 6.84 | 86% | LOST | |
Games in each set3-6 1-6 CizekSchwaerzlerPoints won38%62%Serve points won47%72%Return points won28%53%Games held3 of 87 of 8Break points saved3 of 81 of 2Aces33Double faults63 | |||||||
| 2026-08-03 | Grodzisk Mazowiecki | Hard | M. Basic | RET | 3.88 | 76% | WON |
Games in each set6-4 1-1 | |||||||
| 2026-08-02 | Grodzisk Mazowiecki | Hard | M. Efstathiou | 4.30 | 78% | WON | |
Games in each set6-4 2-6 6-3 CizekEfstathiouPoints won52%48%Serve points won58%54%Return points won46%42%Games held10 of 149 of 13Break points saved4 of 85 of 9Aces84Double faults86 | |||||||
M. Hopp — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | M15 Burgas (Bulgaria) | Clay | M. F. Breazu | — | — | LOST | |
Games in each set6-4 2-6 3-6 HoppBreazuPoints won46%54%Serve points won59%65%Return points won35%41%Games held9 of 1312 of 14Break points saved6 of 104 of 6 | |||||||
| 2026-10-07 | M15 Burgas (Bulgaria) | Clay | F. Ferrari | 1.66 | 58% | WON | |
Games in each set4-6 6-1 6-3 HoppFerrariPoints won55%45%Serve points won61%50%Return points won50%39%Games held10 of 137 of 13Break points saved4 of 76 of 12 | |||||||
| 2026-10-01 | M15 Sibenik | Clay | J. Von der Schulenburg | 3.09 | 70% | LOST | |
Games in each set4-6 4-6 HoppSchulenburgPoints won49%51%Serve points won63%64%Return points won36%37%Games held7 of 109 of 10Break points saved4 of 72 of 3 | |||||||
| 2026-09-30 | M15 Sibenik | Clay | J. Siftar | 1.08 | 84% | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 6-3 HoppSiftarPoints won59%41%Serve points won71%51%Return points won49%29%Games held8 of 95 of 9Break points saved1 of 21 of 5 | |||||||
| 2026-07-08 | M25+H Kassel | Clay | D. Fix | — | — | LOST | |
Games in each set0-6 7-6 5-7 | |||||||
| 2026-07-04 | M25 Marburg | Clay | D. Siniakov | 4.15 | 77% | LOST | |
Games in each set3-6 5-7 | |||||||
| 2026-07-03 | M25 Marburg | Clay | O. Majdandzic | 1.40 | 68% | WON | |
Games in each set6-2 6-3 | |||||||
| 2026-07-02 | M25 Marburg | Clay | L. Poertner | 1.75 | 54% | WON | |
Games in each set5-7 7-5 6-4 | |||||||
| 2026-07-01 | M25 Marburg | Clay | F. Iannaccone | 3.96 | 76% | WON | |
Games in each set6-2 6-2 | |||||||
| 2026-06-26 | M15 Kamen | Clay | O. Krutykh | 6.18 | 85% | LOST | |
Games in each set2-6 6-7 | |||||||