Jan Wygona v Louis Van Herck
The market
Percentages are the implied chance of winning with the bookmaker's margin removed.
Head to head
This season & this event
Ranking points fall off a year after they are earned, so a player who went deep here last year must match it or drop in the rankings. That shapes effort in a way the price does not always show.
The players

Ranking, record and surface splits are for the most recent season on file. Height, weight and handedness are not published by our data provider.
J. Wygona — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-04 | M15 Sharm ElSheikh 16 | Hard | L. Van Herck | 2.50 | 62% | LOST | |
Games in each set4-6 WygonaHerckPoints won43%57%Serve points won54%67%Return points won33%46%Games held5 of 89 of 9Break points saved2 of 45 of 5 | |||||||
| 2026-10-14 | M15 Sharm ElSheikh 13 | Hard | C. Bittoun | 5.00 | 81% | LOST | |
Games in each set2-6 2-6 WygonaBittounPoints won39%61%Serve points won51%78%Return points won22%49%Games held4 of 88 of 8Break points saved3 of 70 of 0 | |||||||
| 2026-10-07 | M15 Sharm ElSheikh 12 | Hard | S. Ivanov | 2.63 | 65% | LOST | |
Games in each set5-7 2-6 WygonaIvanovPoints won44%56%Serve points won53%65%Return points won35%47%Games held5 of 108 of 10Break points saved2 of 73 of 4 | |||||||
| 2026-08-27 | M25 Poznan | Clay | D. Michalski | 13.11 | 93% | LOST | |
Games in each set2-6 1-6 WygonaMichalskiPoints won34%66%Serve points won39%72%Return points won28%61%Games held2 of 86 of 7Break points saved5 of 114 of 5 | |||||||
| 2026-08-26 | M25 Poznan | Clay | J. Chlodnicki | 1.94 | 51% | WON | |
Games in each set6-2 7-6 WygonaChlodnickiPoints won55%45%Serve points won60%50%Return points won50%40%Games held7 of 105 of 11Break points saved4 of 74 of 9 | |||||||
| 2026-08-19 | M15 Krakow | Clay | L. Berto | 2.30 | 59% | LOST | |
Games in each set4-6 4-6 WygonaBertoPoints won45%55%Serve points won56%68%Return points won32%44%Games held7 of 109 of 10Break points saved1 of 41 of 2 | |||||||
| 2026-08-06 | M15 Poprad | Clay | N. Hipfl | 7.76 | 88% | LOST | |
Games in each set2-6 6-3 0-6 | |||||||
| 2026-08-04 | M15 Poprad | Clay | F. Poklemba | 1.31 | 73% | WON | |
Games in each set7-6 6-3 | |||||||
| 2026-07-08 | M15 Lodz | Clay | A. Braynin | 6.86 | 86% | LOST | |
Games in each set4-6 4-6 | |||||||
| 2026-06-24 | M15 Rzeszow (Poland) | Clay | J. Hendrikx | 1.65 | 58% | LOST | |
Games in each set2-6 5-7 | |||||||
L. Van Herck — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-04 | M15 Sharm ElSheikh 16 | Hard | J. Wygona | 1.50 | 62% | LOST | |
Games in each set6-4 HerckWygonaPoints won57%43%Serve points won67%54%Return points won46%33%Games held9 of 95 of 8Break points saved5 of 52 of 4 | |||||||
| 2026-10-06 | M25 Kigali 2 | Clay | Y. Oliel | 4.10 | 77% | LOST | |
Games in each set4-6 6-3 3-6 HerckOlielPoints won48%52%Serve points won65%67%Return points won33%35%Games held11 of 1412 of 14Break points saved2 of 47 of 9 | |||||||
| 2026-09-30 | M25 Kigali | Clay | C. Hemery | 8.00 | 88% | LOST | |
Games in each set1-6 3-6 HerckHemeryPoints won38%62%Serve points won54%72%Return points won28%46%Games held4 of 79 of 9Break points saved1 of 40 of 0 | |||||||
| 2026-09-24 | M15 Forbach | Grass | T. Trufelli | 2.16 | 56% | LOST | |
Games in each set6-3 3-6 4-6 HerckTrufelliPoints won48%52%Serve points won60%65%Return points won35%40%Games held11 of 1412 of 14Break points saved2 of 56 of 8 | |||||||
| 2026-09-22 | M15 Forbach | Grass | A. Raynel | — | — | WON | |
Games in each set6-1 6-4 HerckRaynelPoints won56%44%Serve points won61%50%Return points won50%39%Games held7 of 84 of 9Break points saved4 of 54 of 7 | |||||||
| 2026-09-18 | ATP Davis Cup - World Group I | - Preliminary | F. Marozsan | 17.00 | 94% | LOST | |
Games in each set4-6 4-6 HerckMarozsanPoints won44%56%Serve points won57%70%Return points won30%43%Games held6 of 108 of 10Break points saved4 of 80 of 2Aces51Double faults22 | |||||||
| 2026-09-09 | M25 Plaisir + H (France) | Hard | R. Dugardin | 2.25 | 59% | LOST | |
Games in each set4-6 4-6 HerckDugardinPoints won46%54%Serve points won59%71%Return points won29%41%Games held7 of 109 of 10Break points saved10 of 133 of 4 | |||||||
| 2026-08-26 | M15 Allershausen | Clay | W. Rejchtman Vinciguerra | 2.94 | 68% | LOST | |
Games in each set5-7 6-1 6-7 HerckVinciguerraPoints won52%48%Serve points won63%58%Return points won42%37%Games held12 of 1511 of 16Break points saved8 of 117 of 12 | |||||||
| 2026-08-20 | M15 Lambermont | Clay | M. Vankan | 3.34 | 72% | LOST | |
Games in each set2-6 6-7 | |||||||
| 2026-08-19 | M15 Lambermont | Clay | T. Boosarawongse | — | — | WON | |
Games in each set6-1 1-6 7-6 HerckBoosarawongsePoints won49%51%Serve points won59%62%Return points won38%41%Games held10 of 1310 of 13Break points saved3 of 62 of 5 | |||||||
Common questions
Who is favourite, Jan Wygona or Louis Van Herck?
Louis Van Herck is favourite at 1.50, which is a 62% chance once the bookmaker's margin is removed.
What are the odds for Jan Wygona vs Louis Van Herck?
Jan Wygona is 2.50 and Louis Van Herck is 1.50, the prices we recorded for the M15 Sharm ElSheikh 16 match.