ITFHardW35 Bakersfield, CA2026-10-21 19:00
Diletta Cherubini v Amelie Hejtmanek
The market
No published price yet
Percentages are the implied chance of winning with the bookmaker's margin removed.
Head to head
First career meetingNo previous matches between these two on record.
This season & this event
D. Cherubini
A. Hejtmanek
19-28
8-11
Did not play
Did not play
2026 record
2026 on hard
Here in 2025
Here in 2024
15-12
3-7
Did not play
Did not play
Ranking points fall off a year after they are earned, so a player who went deep here last year must match it or drop in the rankings. That shapes effort in a way the price does not always show.
The players

Diletta Cherubini
Italy
Amelie Hejtmanek
Czech Republic
357
24
Italy
8–10
0
5–6
3–4
—
Ranking
Age
Country
2026 W/L
Titles
Hard
Clay
Grass
1095
18
Czech Republic
1–1
0
1–1
—
—
Ranking, record and surface splits are for the most recent season on file. Height, weight and handedness are not published by our data provider.
D. Cherubini — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-14 | W35 Redding, CA | Hard | C. McNeil | 1.49 | 64% | LOST | |
Games in each set4-6 6-4 1-6 CherubiniMcNeilPoints won49%51%Serve points won52%54%Return points won46%48%Games held7 of 1310 of 14Break points saved11 of 177 of 11 | |||||||
| 2026-10-09 | W35 Las Vegas | Hard | E. K. Malmkjaer | — | — | LOST | |
Games in each set2-6 4-6 CherubiniMalmkjaerPoints won45%55%Serve points won52%61%Return points won39%48%Games held5 of 108 of 9Break points saved0 of 47 of 8 | |||||||
| 2026-10-08 | W35 Las Vegas | Hard | T. Frodin | 2.75 | 66% | WON | |
Games in each set4-6 6-3 7-6 CherubiniFrodinPoints won49%51%Serve points won58%61%Return points won39%42%Games held11 of 1610 of 15Break points saved3 of 83 of 8 | |||||||
| 2026-10-07 | W35 Las Vegas | Hard | N. Kha | — | — | WON | |
Games in each set6-1 6-3 CherubiniKhaPoints won60%40%Serve points won70%51%Return points won49%30%Games held8 of 84 of 8Break points saved4 of 42 of 6 | |||||||
| 2026-09-24 | W50 Yecla | Hard | G. Garcia-Perez | 1.78 | 54% | LOST | |
Games in each set6-2 4-6 1-6 CherubiniGarcia-PerezPoints won50%50%Serve points won53%55%Return points won45%47%Games held6 of 128 of 13Break points saved9 of 151 of 6 | |||||||
| 2026-09-22 | W50 Yecla | Hard | I. L. Van den Broek | — | — | WON | |
Games in each set6-1 3-6 6-3 CherubiniBroekPoints won54%46%Serve points won64%54%Return points won46%36%Games held10 of 137 of 12Break points saved3 of 67 of 12 | |||||||
| 2026-09-14 | Valencia | Clay | A. Teixido Garcia | 2.01 | 52% | LOST | |
Games in each set4-6 0-6 CherubiniGarciaPoints won39%61%Serve points won40%61%Return points won39%60%Games held2 of 86 of 8Break points saved2 of 82 of 4Aces01Double faults25 | |||||||
| 2026-09-13 | Valencia | Clay | I. Shinikova | 1.75 | 55% | WON | |
Games in each set4-6 6-4 6-4 CherubiniShinikovaPoints won51%49%Serve points won57%57%Return points won43%43%Games held11 of 1510 of 15Break points saved2 of 67 of 12Aces10Double faults96 | |||||||
| 2026-09-10 | W35 Reus | Clay | M. Paoletti | 2.87 | 67% | LOST | |
Games in each set1-6 0-6 CherubiniPaolettiPoints won33%67%Serve points won35%68%Return points won32%65%Games held1 of 67 of 7Break points saved1 of 60 of 0 | |||||||
| 2026-09-08 | W35 Reus | Clay | N. Torner Sensano | 1.63 | 59% | WON | |
Games in each set5-7 6-3 6-1 CherubiniSensanoPoints won53%47%Serve points won50%45%Return points won55%50%Games held8 of 146 of 14Break points saved3 of 85 of 12 | |||||||
A. Hejtmanek — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-13 | W35 Redding, CA | Hard | A. Penickova | 11.15 | 91% | LOST | |
Games in each set0-6 3-6 HejtmanekPenickovaPoints won39%61%Serve points won33%57%Return points won43%67%Games held1 of 76 of 8Break points saved6 of 125 of 7 | |||||||
| 2026-10-07 | W35 Las Vegas | Hard | H. Chang | 7.43 | 87% | LOST | |
Games in each set2-6 4-6 HejtmanekChangPoints won42%58%Serve points won45%61%Return points won39%55%Games held4 of 97 of 9Break points saved2 of 72 of 4 | |||||||
| 2026-09-30 | W15 Nashville | Hard | C. Di Genova | 1.15 | 79% | LOST | |
Games in each set4-6 6-4 3-6 HejtmanekGenovaPoints won49%51%Serve points won49%52%Return points won48%51%Games held7 of 149 of 15Break points saved8 of 156 of 12 | |||||||
| 2026-08-26 | W35 Trieste | Clay | A. Antici | 1.03 | 95% | WON | |
Games in each set6-2 6-4 HejtmanekAnticiPoints won57%43%Serve points won60%46%Return points won54%40%Games held7 of 94 of 9Break points saved5 of 710 of 15 | |||||||
| 2026-08-26 | W35 Trieste | Clay | M. Colmegna | 3.20 | 71% | LOST | |
Games in each set3-6 1-6 HejtmanekColmegnaPoints won42%58%Serve points won44%60%Return points won40%56%Games held2 of 86 of 8Break points saved9 of 153 of 5 | |||||||
| 2026-08-09 | W15 Hameenlinna | Clay | L. Hietaranta | 3.67 | 74% | WON | |
Games in each set6-4 2-6 6-4 | |||||||
| 2026-08-08 | W15 Hameenlinna | Clay | V. Pohle | RET | 2.12 | 55% | WON |
Games in each set6-3 1-0 | |||||||
| 2026-08-07 | W15 Hameenlinna | Clay | M. Hageman | 1.88 | 51% | WON | |
Games in each set1-6 6-4 7-5 | |||||||
| 2026-08-06 | W15 Hameenlinna | Clay | A. Soulie | 1.42 | 67% | WON | |
Games in each set7-6 6-3 | |||||||
| 2026-08-05 | W15 Hameenlinna | Clay | M. Maslenkova | 1.06 | 91% | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 6-2 | |||||||